Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subground


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Subground

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable music genre, no GHits other than social media, no GNews hits. Too soon, if it is a developing genre and not merely promotional. GregJackP  Boomer!   01:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:NOTE at this time.--  SabreBD  (talk) 08:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. If this genre exists at all, it doesn't seem to have gotten off the ground, and none of the supposed artists affiliated with the genre even have articles. (It doesn't help that the article is written like a journal entry.)  Erpert  Who is this guy? 05:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - This genre is really small if it exists. It's WP:TOOSOON right now. If it gets more of a following, it could probably claim notability. T  C  N7 JM  09:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.