Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subiblicly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 18:07, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Subiblicly
Neologism, vaguely defined. Original research. Google has never heard of the word. Speedy tags repeatedly removed. --Tabor 16:46, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. And burn it.  And the user account of the creator. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 18:40, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. ERcheck 20:15, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dictdef that is not even defined. According to the article, the “underlying principals and meaning...are both still unclear” and there is no way “to know in what sense this term is used”. &bull;DanMS 00:00, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. mdd4696 23:53, 25 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.