Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subic-Clark Expressway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Subic-Clark Expressway
Blatant copyvio of http://www.jbic.go.jp/autocontents/english/news/2001/000041/Phil2.htm. Dark Shikari 15:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. However, I'm all for this kind of article if original. Interesting stuff.    --nathanbeach   16:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Then why do you vote delete instead of rewriting? --HResearcher 02:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Remove the copyvio stuff and rewrite. Passes WP:NN. Th ε Halo Θ 19:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep copyedit, research, and contribute. But is it notably encyclopedic? --HResearcher 02:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. Highways are inherently notable (at least on Wikipedia!), and User:Akosikupal has corrected the copyright violation.  Powers 21:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.