Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subliminal Stimuli (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 13:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Subliminal Stimuli (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent indications of notability from major musical sources; no major labels. - Altenmann >t 16:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, essentially per the nominator. Ironholds (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete --SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 07:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep

Release on a label -> https://sites.google.com/site/channelqrecords/artists/subliminal-stimuli

Notability from music sources -> http://www.sputnikmusic.com/bands/Subliminal-Stimuli/54167/

Published works -> https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/w32-.-mydoom-mm/id786770671

The page qualifies for some of the following notability standards:

"Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability."

"Has composed a number of melodies, tunes or standards used in a notable genre, or tradition or school within a notable genre."

"Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture."

Conkern65 (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay. What publications? What tunes? What style? Ironholds (talk) 23:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Ahh, vanity unsated. - Altenmann >t 03:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 10:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.