Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subsignal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Subsignal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this. The creator contested the prod and said "it is because it is a NEW band, that is why you will not find enought coverage of it. Hang on until the CD releases next month". Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't for advertising your non-notable garage band. Fails notability per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 05:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, WP:crystal  Chzz  ►  05:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. It is not notable yet. They might be the next Nirvana, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Once the album is released, if they get enough coverage, an article will be due. At the moment, I'd actually say that they qualify for a speedy deletion. McMarcoP (talk) 07:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per above. It's too early to create an article on this. Victão Lopes  I hear you... 19:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.