Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Substance® (design)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Substance® (design)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Can't find any trace of him on the internet, likely non-notable Passportguy (talk) 11:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

I am not sure why it is you have aproblem with this link. Substance® design work has been reproduced in print in numerous design anthologies and published worldwide. Is that not proof of validity? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Princewith2spleens (talk • contribs) 12:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete sufficient notablity is not claimed, and certainly not established. --Pontificalibus (talk) 12:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - close to blatant spam so I would almost say speedy delete.  Completely NN - ghits for name and company name yeild only 2 - one of which was this article.    Also it's COI and I've marked the original poster for UAA as promotional.  -- JCutter (talk) 12:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam- and possibly hoax-tastic. Ironholds (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity page. Daniel Case (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, for reasons stated above. Dialectric (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 22:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete This is spam and should have been speedy deleted as such. Pichpich (talk) 03:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.