Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subtropical Storm One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Subtropical Storm One

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnecessary disambiguation page; "one" isn't a name, so it's essentially an indiscriminate list of storms which happened to be the first in a season. Fails WP:IINFO. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete - I agree 100%, this disambiguation page is not needed. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 22:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. "One" is not a name, and there are some storms on that list that weren't officially called by this name. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep — if we have three articles with virtually the same title (1978, 1982, and 1992), why shouldn't we have a disambiguation page? Perhaps not all of them were officially called by that name, but as it appears that some were, such a question seems to be a matter of content for that page, not for AFD.  Nyttend (talk) 04:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The existence of the three articles cited by Nyttend makes the existence of a dab page desirable: "Disambiguation is required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might use the 'Go button', there is more than one Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead" (WP:DAB). If some of the other items in the list have never been referred to as Subtropical Storm One, those entries can be deleted. Deor (talk) 11:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * weak keepnot quite sure about this one, but i kind of agree that ya, three articles and one name need a disambiguation. Fatmanandlittleboy (talk) 21:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)fatmanandlittleboy
 * Keep Convenient page serves to both disambiguate and provide some information. 07:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.