Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suburban Kid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No one, except the nominator, advocates deletion of the article. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Suburban Kid

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be notable; does not appear to feature on any major charts or the subject of articles from major websites. LF (talk) 06:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment, this article notes that the album "was released with little fanfare in 2003". Bob Evans (aka Kevin from Jebediah) is definitely notable, and there is oodles of coverage for his second album, but I don't know if there is really enough for this one.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC).
 * Keep the album has sufficient third party coverage for it to be retained in its own right. In response to Lankiveil's comments there are also numerous articles which indicate that its release recieved favourable response from music critics.Dan arndt (talk) 04:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment There's no doubt that Bob Evans is notable, but it seems this album got little attention. There are quite a few hits on the Australian music sites, but most are limited to a mention in a review of the next album, Suburban Songbook. Plus, I think the Bob Evans page covers the subject pretty well.Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Significant coverage in reliable sources has now been provided by Dan arndt. The article should be kept per WP:GNG.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.