Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Successful Access of Information in Developing Countries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Successful Access of Information in Developing Countries

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Orphaned article, and not appropriate article for encylcopedia. Perhaps one of the services listed should have an article. 650l2520 22:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete An important subject, but better done by starting from scratch, especially as this term is merely the chapter heading in a book & is excessively wordy for a good title. Each one of the 4 systems discussed should have articles, & all but the third do have longstanding good articles, and we should write one for AGORA--it's an agricultural information system, and we're short of interested editors on that subject. That the ed. did not know about the other articles and made no attempt to look for them is an indication of the advisability of deletion of this. probable cut-and-paste. DGG 02:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Since there is no wikilinks in the entire article I doubt the editor knew how to do it. I found Public Library of Science and eIFL.net - Electronic Information for Libraries, but where is HINARI - Health Internetwork Access to Research Initiative? 650l2520 20:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, essay-ish and unencyclopedic with activist or promotional tone. "Successful" is POV. --Dhartung | Talk 08:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic in both name and contents. Pavel Vozenilek 17:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.