Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suckball


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. &asymp; jossi &asymp; t &bull; @ 05:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Suckball
"a million useless opinions on everything" pretty much says it. vanity page, delete. Just plain Bill 16:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Anybody got something to show how these guys and their site are notable or encyclopedic? Somebody? Anything? Just plain Bill 17:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I believe they've been linked to by CollegeHumor. That's enough for me to give them a keep.--Josh 07:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 23:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of compliance with WP:WEB. Capitalistroadster 01:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete rubbish.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-noatable blog. Made up in school one day and taken way too far subsequently. -- Krash (Talk) 15:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB and WP:NFT. Being linked to by a mindless-link-propagation website, especially a humor site, is not enough to get my "keep" vote.  Otherwise there would be a few dozen websites every day, thousands per year, which have no lasting significance and no societal influence but would nonetheless get WP articles in violation of our more important policies.  Barno 20:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This site is most popular with English-speaking Asians. Don't let American bias lead you to delete this entry. (unsigned comment 03:55, 22 February 2006 from 24.176.41.235)
 * Never mind the "whatever-centric" argument; please show how the site is notable. Feel free to date and sign your comments with four tildes: (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) Just plain Bill 07:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.