Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sucker Punch (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was a bit of a cheeky WP:IAR, but this had consensus last time, so I'm confused as to its relisting. Consensus was to delete first time, however going to harmlessly redirect per User:JJL. Esteffect (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have also, per the highlighting of a user, protected the redirect from changes by new and unregistered users until the end of May (when filming would begin, the earliest possible point it is likely for the film to not fail WP:CRYSTAL, and thus an article be CSD criteria as recreation of deleted material). Esteffect (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Sucker Punch (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF, as principal photography has not begun &mdash;Kww(talk) 23:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete: notability yet to be established WP:CRYSTAL. JamesBurns (talk) 09:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. Juanacho (talk) 20:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 00:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Zack_Snyder; fails WP:NFF (pre-filming), but sourced, so rd to director . JJL (talk) 01:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.