Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not at all notable. It is a simple fan's article. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 03:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  --Sodabottle (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  --Sodabottle (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Nothing has changed since the last AfD two months back. Subject has GNG as indicated by the references in the article. He might be "just a Fan" as the nom says, but he is also "a fan with non trivial coverage in multiple independent reliable sources". And having such an article is not new. We do have a whole category of "Sport Spectators" with 38 other pages in it. I know this is a variation of "Other Stuff Exists", but merely pointing out inclusion of sports fans with GNG in Wikipedia is not a new practice. --Sodabottle (talk) 05:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. However distasteful some editors may find coverage of sports fans, the article contains references sufficient in quantity and quality to show that this particular spectator is notable. Emily Jensen (talk) 06:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly notable as demonstrated by reliable sources.. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep- The provided citation support notability Rirunmot 21:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rirunmot (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - There was an article on BBC today... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8636516.stm Chocolate Horlicks (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.