Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhir Yadav (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  19:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Sudhir Yadav
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep -- Sources already in article about Whatsapp lawsuit are sufficient to meet GNG. But I can just hear my skeptical colleagues invoking ONEEVENT!  Consider, then, that he's also getting a lot of coverage as spokesman for a major party just now.  Thus not ONEEVENT. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 17:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note the article was deleted in the first  AFD Articles for deletion/Sudhir Yadav and the nom statement surmises it the best below and is relevant here.Actually it could be candidate for G4.Article created for promotional purposes and almost all the sources are WP:NEWS and not about the subject.
 * Autobiography of social activist not yet notable per WP:BIO, WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG. There are a few passing mentions of his name in the press, in articles about corruption cases, but I can find no significant coverage of him online from WP:Reliable sources. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The subject is not a national spokesperson for his party only the media incharge for the party in Haryana one of the 29 states of India.AAP is not a major party outside Delhi and Punjab.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Exploreandwrite (talk) 11:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Being a spokesperson of Aam Aadmi Party does make him notable. Added a recent article on his arrest.
 * No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Keep votes above seem to be confusing the number of references in an article with an indication of GNG. I don't see any indication that this specific person is independently notable. Most if not all of the coverage I was able to located about Sudhir yadav was trivial. Even then, mentions of are almost all trivial name-drops in lists of the filed the cases ,dismissed.None of them are any of that qualify as in-depth coverage.Note he is Spokesman or Media in charge of AAP party for only Haryana one of the 29 states in India.If we look at these sources individually:
 * - about the dismissal of a case seeking a ban on Whatsup mentions the subject filed the case.
 * - about DPS school case mentions subject filed the case
 * - about a case which was dismissed merely mentions subject filed the case.
 * - about a case mentions subject filed the case
 * - about a case mentions subject filed the case
 * - about a case mentions subject filed the case
 * - about a case mentions subject filed the case
 * - about a case mentions subject filed the case which is dismissed
 * - about a case mentions subject filed the case which is dismissed
 * - about a case mentions subject filed the case
 * - about the case mentions the subject is a 27 year old Software engineer


 * not a WP:RS source discusses the case and quotes the subject mentions subject is from Gurgoan.
 * AAP party announced its candidate and the subject as the AAP's Haryana media in-charge made the announcement on behalf of the party at a press confernce.
 * mentions that  Sudhir Yadav made the announcement at a press conference on behalf of the party
 * Subject made the announcement on behalf of the party at a press conference
 * Subject made the announcement at a press conference on behalf of the party
 * Five AAP workers detained - routine news of 5 AAP party workers being detained during a protest including the subject.(added by 2nd keep above)Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete party spokespeople are not inherently notable. No other credible claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Leading newspapers reference the subject and has sufficient sourcing, including verified social media handles, to meet WP:GNG. I don't necessarily think the current makeup of the article warrants a deletion. WillPeppers (talk) 18:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 20:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment As noted above even in the First AFD. That the individual lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. A single sentence mention is not significant coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG and NPOL. GSS (talk |c|em ) 15:45, 1 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.