Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudip Roy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Sudip Roy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A borderline promotional article with a very limited number of citations and questionable notability - by which I mean I'm not seeing a lot of awards or history-related achievements to speak of. I invite community input on the matter to find consensus. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:49, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Probably delete as my searches found nothing particularly outstanding (here and here). SwisterTwister   talk  17:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:51, 25 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 04:11, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Appears to fail WP:GNG. A google search reveals quite a few hits, but they are all by Roy, not about him.  Onel 5969  TT me 23:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.