Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudip giri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the article fails the notability guielines. Davewild (talk) 20:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Sudip giri

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article may not meet WP:notability keystoneridin! (talk) 06:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Per WP:BLOWITUP, unless someone is willing to do some major cleanup on this article.  Jay Jay Talk to me 17:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep : The content of the article should not be lost only because it requires a cleanup. Rather I shall advocate to place appropriate tags for cleanup. I'll also try to lend some hand for its improvement. And also the person seems notable. VIVEK RAI : Friend?  08:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not because it needs cleanup, but because the subject isn't notable. DoctorKubla (talk) 16:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I reafirm my delete vote because the person does not seem notable  Jay Jay Talk to me 03:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * JayJay, I struck your second delete !vote, as you had already requested deletion above. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.