Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suel Forrester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Suel Forrester

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of SNL. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Merge as above--same rationale, but try to find some way to review these systematically. DGG (talk) 16:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No need to merge. Wikipedia is not a directory of every sketch character created on SNL.  Some are more famous than others and should be covered in proportion to their exposure in secondary sources.  The three gnews hits that come up all make the same one sentence comment about the character in a biographical sketch about Kattan.  I'm not inclined to feel that is more than trivial coverage. Protonk (talk) 17:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  21:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Agree with Protonk to the extent Wikipedia no need to have content about every sketch in every show covered here. But for some shows, there is in fact need. The show in question is Saturday Night Live, one of the key shows in the genre. For the most important shows, we should have such content--content, not articles. . Again, Protonk is right that here is not enough notability for a separate article; but there does have to be for content in an article. DGG (talk) 22:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No need to merge or redirect. Not every character has to have a redirect. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.