Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SugarStars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete (transwikied). John Reaves (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

SugarStars

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article for a webcomic. It asserts notability, so it's not a candidate for A7. However, the article still does not satisfy the notability guidelines for web content (website hits aren't on WP:WEB, and it only "nearly" reached the top 10 of a toplist), and the article reads somewhat like an advertisement. There is also some crystal-ballism afoot, and all but one of the sources are the comic itself. Core desat  08:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, NN as all get out. Beyond that, possible WP:COI, as this article is the sole Wiki activity of its creator.  I take this article's assertions of notability with a boulder of salt, let alone a grain ... a directed Google search ("SugarStars" + Shirou, the comic's author) turned up all of 28 hits, most of which is this Wiki article and mirrors and from the strip's own website.  The traffic rank on Alexa for the umbrella website is a miniscule #434,646. RGTraynor 16:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Well no, actually i was just editing the info that other people added onto the article. I didn't create it. the people from the forums of SugarStars did, but whatever the case I have no problem with you guys deleting this if it really is necessary. ~Ranu —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lavenderflower (talk • contribs) 22:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Comment If it's not already there, it might be a good idea to transwiki this to Comixpedia. --Core desat  08:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Where, as it happens, it doesn't seem to be notable enough to appear either. RGTraynor 14:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Comixpedia doesn't have notability guidelines. --Core desat  20:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Which would suggest that no one cares. RGTraynor 04:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * well you're a blunt one aren't you.76.97.51.60 14:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've transwikied the article to Comixpedia myself. --Core desat  09:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Well then if nothing can be done, then nothing will be done. so just delete the article. Lavenderflower 15:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.