Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Mediaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 23:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Sugar Mediaz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article not satisfying the notability guidelines Ninney (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG, no coverage in independent sources, only primary sources found. Nick—Contact/Contribs 16:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:02, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:02, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks even one reliable independent secondary source to support notability as required by WP:GNG.  And for good reason.  Based on my Google searches, I don't believe they exist.  Msnicki (talk) 01:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete LinkedIn and Zoominfo are the only sources. I would have supported a PROD. CorporateM (Talk) 16:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Multiple searches found nothing significant and notable with results here, here and here (a separate search found nothing at thefreelibrary). SwisterTwister   talk  06:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.