Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Pond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 08:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Sugar Pond
Been here since August. Non-notable barely begins to describe it. D e nni &#9775;  03:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for significant information Schlockading 05:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, this is highly insignificant. eg..."There is a little shack by the pond" ...... ArgentiumOutlaw 08:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This is funny! (Or maybe I'm just sleep deprived and slap-happy) Delete.  Only really note worth ponds like Walden Pond should have their own articles, and actually that's large enough to be considered a small lake.  Blackcats 11:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Sugar Pond offers ice skating during the winter when the temperature is cold enough. A red/green indicator by the pond and at the Recreation Department downtown says whether the ice is safe to skate on. There is a little shack by the pond, but it is rarely open. Delete, text book example of unencyclopedic information. Any pond can be skated on if it's cold enough, so that's totally irrelevant. I'm pretty sure more ponds have such a light and the shack has nothing to do with the pond. Once all that is removed, you're left with CSD A1 material. - Mgm|(talk) 13:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Gary Kirk (talk) 13:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Zunaid 14:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3rd weakest keep ever. I give geographic features the benefit of the notability doubt, but this almost stretches it. Youngamerican 14:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: to the closing admin, If keep is not an option, I transfer my vote to merge. Youngamerican 13:00, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is too little. --Kilo-Lima 17:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to town article. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 21:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.