Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar tit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn based on references provided by Hateless and the community consensus. YechielMan 19:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Sugar tit

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A google search reveals that people do use the term "sugar tit" as in the article, but there is not a single notable source - say, a news item or a significant fiction writer - to affirm its notability. YechielMan 04:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. My google search found references to "sugar tit" from the University of South Carolina and The New York Times, and the term apparently appears in Zola Neale Hurston's Their Eyes were Watching God (see glossary here). All of which is consistent with the article, as a sugary pacifier. hateless 06:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This term is used in Gone with the Wind. --Lmblackjack21 06:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by User:Hateless. -- Black Falcon 06:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a notable term. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  06:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, is also used in A Streetcar Named Desire, I believe. Bob talk 08:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, I've heard of it... nah, kiddinh! Well I have, but that isn't a good reason for keeping. But those reasons mentioned above are however. Mathmo Talk 11:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Withdrawing nomination. YechielMan 19:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.