Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugarmonkey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Sugarmonkey

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Some indications of significant coverage, but not backed up with actual sources. I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years now, so hopefully we can resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, I could not find evidence of any significant independent coverage to establish notability. Left guide (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find any evidence to suggest this band meets WP:GNG. There could be some offline evidence in published versions of the sources mentioned in the article, but I'm not sure there will be much more published about them. The only reliable independent coverage I could find online was this not-so-kind review of one of their gigs from Digital Spy. pinktoebeans  (talk) 21:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.