Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suggestions page

Suggestions page was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Doesn't seem an appropiate place. Should have "Wikipedia" prefix. I thought that one of these already existed anyway (though I can't find it :S. Similar to "Requested features". Delete. Estel 19:46, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC) **Note. This user does not actually exist. See Votes for deletion/Quoth the raven, Eversor. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 16:29, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Village pump is where you can make comments and suggestions. Jeff Knaggs 19:49, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment. Yes, Village pump (proposals). Found it now: thanks. Estel 20:07, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Duplicate and unneeded function. Geogre 20:45, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. The author seems to have agreed to this. Andrewa 23:27, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - could prove very useful. Dracula the bat
 * Sorry, I got confused there with all the windows I had open from "Dr. Chicken's" contributions and thought this was one. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 16:29, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - could prove to hinder the usefulness of Wikipedia, as the Village Pump is a convenient place for this sort of discussion and we don't need to split it into two pages. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 16:32, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Easy delete, this is the wrong place for this. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:36, Nov 23, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.