Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sula Kim (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Sula Kim
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Re-nomination after previous AfD was closed due to having been started by a banned user. This is not just a procedural nomination: my opinion is that this article should be deleted. Local journalist, only GNews hits are bylines and trivial mentions. The fact that we have articles about other local non-notable journalists is not justification for keeping this article. Thanks, cab (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. The coverage in Google News Archive is limited to passing mentions. The Google Books results are false positives that are unrelated to this individual, and a Google search returns mostly social-networking sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pipl, etc. The subject fails WP:BIO. Cunard (talk) 07:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.