Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumaira Tazeen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Sumaira Tazeen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no in-depth coverage in RS. some information in the bio is OR and is not inline cited. allegedly created by a sock puppet. an investigation is underway at Sockpuppet investigations/Rashid Ghafoor. --Saqib (talk) 09:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak keep The sources in the article are minimal, but at least a couple do go into her work in detail. I see others in Google books. Minimally notable, but notable.104.163.148.25 (talk) 08:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep When I checked the 8 existing references at the article, I saw many possibilities for improvement. True, no inline citations and original research. But it can be removed. The Express Tribune article is exclusively on her art. Some art or museums-related articles are interviews with her about her work. I see some hope for the article, if improved. Ngrewal1 (talk) 08:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * delete as coverage is not enough to pass WP:NARTIST. Störm   (talk)  11:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ngrewal. This article should not be deleted because it has potential for improvement. Davey2116 (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - apart from the Express Tribune article above, there's this Dawn article that is exclusively on her. 39.57.181.120 (talk) 06:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.