Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumantra Sumo Dutta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Sumantra Sumo Dutta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Repeatedly rejected at AfC, unilaterally moved to mainspace by one of the primary contributors. The provided coverage is limited to press releases, unreliable sources without bylines, WP:ROUTINE coverage, and trivial coverage in the form of softball interviews and quotes from the subject in the context of one of the companies that he has worked for. signed,Rosguill talk 22:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Ahnaf Lion (talk) 16:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)The person described here is a veteran of the Indian media industry and even though he has primarily worked in STAR, STAR is a behemoth player in the industry and his performance & contribution for STAR has actually impacted the industry notably. Unilateral decision of the primary contributor to move the article was motivated by his being a scholar of Indian sub-continent media industry. The citations inserted here are from sources that are notable among the industry critics. Also, a same version of the article was reviewed and approved in 2018. Therefore, the article shouldn't at all e deleted. Ahnaf Lion (talk) 16:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The 2018 review was conducted by, who has been blocked as a sockpuppet that was approving non-notable promotional articles. signed,Rosguill talk 17:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Still has the same fundamental problems as the version most recently rejected at AfC (link). Cheers, 1292simon (talk)
 * Delete Purely promotional article that lacks evidence of passing WP:GNG or any applicable WP:SNG. Coverage that is significant is either not independent or not reliable and vice-versa. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.