Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumarria Lunn Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Sumarria Lunn Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't see how the topic of this WP:SPA-created page is notable. The gallery gets about 12 news hits, all relating to discussion of work or artists who had shown or been shown there. I do not see any of the substantial in-depth coverage of the business itself that would either justify having an article or enable us to write it – though the Independent article is a small step in that direction. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 23:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I was going to suggest a merge to Will Lunn, but notability by our standards is marginal there as well. GNG and NCORP fail.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Of those sources that are about the gallery and not what it is showing... Whitehot Magazine of Contemporary Art probably satisfies as being sustained coverage in a WP:RS. The 2 Dazed features are interviews so don't count. There's a bit more than just an announcement (albeit along with an interview, which has to be discounted) in The Independent in 2011. If Whitehot is a RS then that totals 1.5 by my reckoning, not enough to build an article on yet but enough to think that one could be salvageable given a deeper hunt for sources. -Lopifalko (talk) 06:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree that the Whitehot Magazine meet the criteria for establishing notability but I don't think any of the others are. Hopefully another reference can be found (I am unable to locate any) but if not, I would say Delete.  HighKing++ 13:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 22:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - not the best article, but this is about a gallery in a major art district, with at least a couple of in-depth, reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 19:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: an unremarkable private gallery; available sourcing fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.