Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumbul Touqeer Khan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone is interested in working on a Draft version, contact me. Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Sumbul Touqeer Khan
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Likely UPE, and fails WP:NACTOR, references are mainly interviews with Khan, with little or no editorial, one is a 404 error. Nothing substantial here. WP:ADMASQ. The prior article was deleted at AfD. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 14:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 04:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television,  and India. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NACTOR UtherSRG (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - To me this topic appears possibly notable in near future, I would suggest to incubate the article and move it to Drafts instead of deletion until it meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. ManaliJain (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Draftify seems ok, there looks like a much bigger article could be built, but it's not quite there yet. Oaktree b (talk) 21:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * strong delete the subject was not notable one year ago, and they are not notable now. Argument supporting draftify - "will be notable in future" is a WP:CRYSTAL argument. UPE tag at the article is also off putting. If the subject becomes notable in future, a genuine wikipedian might create the article, or there is the paid editor. We shouldn't tolerate/entertain UPEs. —usernamekiran (talk) 11:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.