Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumeet Patil (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Sumeet Patil
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sumeet Patil

Indian art director who does not appear to satisfy creative notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself and explain why the subject is notable, and this does not. It says that he has developed a technique to allow the blind to paint, using fragrances. That is a credible claim of significance, but this is not an A7 nomination. The reference is 404-compliant, and so fails verifiability, which is a precondition to notability. It states that he received an award, but on verification, the award appears to be one that is given to children, and so is interesting, but does not establish notability. Other than that, the article consists of a filmography of films that are merely names. So there is nothing in the article itself to establish notability. A check of the references is not helpful. One is a promoted story. Another says that he received an award that appears to be given to children. Two of the references are 404-compliant, and four of them are IMDB. The IMDB references were not checked (because they were IMDB).
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, Visual arts,  and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. After repairing the 404 Times of India links, I've concluded the first one may be useful, but it's behind a paywall, with only 3 sentences showing. The second makes no mention of Sumeet Patil. Even if the first turns out to be significant and verifiable, one potential RS does not make a GNG case. There's no there there. — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No indication of notability under GNG or any SNG -- Ab207 (talk) 13:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.