Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumeet Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Sumeet Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient coverage to meet WP:DIRECTOR, and only brief mentions in sources given. Article creator is likely the subject, based on the username. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Additional info - page was twice deleted as WP:A7 (one of those in combination with WP:G11). Previous incarnations were created by now-blocked user . --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete have had this on my watchlist and it's been an uphill battle trying to keep it neutral in the face of promotional editing by obviously connected editors who think they own the article. It still is a case of WP:PROMO and is mainly original research so it's best deleted. If better sources can be found in the future a neutral editor would be better skilled at recreating a non-promotional article, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: The earlier WP:SPA was blocked for self-promotion in August 2016, the similar WP:SPA  creates this instance in September 2016. The provided references are mere passing mentions for the subject / his company, and do not support the WP:PEACOCK claims in the article text. Although there is a lifestyle item in The Tribune(2015) promoting the subject, I do not see evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.