Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumika Boyrachasya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Sumika Boyrachasya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most of what little coverage there is, is largely about Kumari (goddess), with little attention given to who the person taking the role is. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Any novel case for inherent notability as a godperson (not yet in our guidelines), I considered and rejected. There isn't just one Kumari. Every Newar community can have one, many in fact do, making them number several at a time, reigning as little as four years. Royal Kumari as apparently the most important Kumari, gets a recurrent discussion in the Kumari main article. Whatever the fact behind that may be, the subject isn't one, anyway. These appear to be just children who take a role for a few years and then go back to their normal lives- normal schools, normal jobs. And the subject has also done just that. In short, fails GNG, isn't covered by any SNG, and there isn't a good reason to consider adding a new SNG. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete This is a mess waiting to happen if we allow it to stay. Although I am tempted to compare this role to that of beauty queens, who are maybe worse because they only hold the title for one year, if that. I once thought every state beauty queen was notable, I since came to see them as not, and probably nominated over a hundred such articles for deletion. However we still have a lot of hold outs in there from the old days.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.