Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summersteps Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Scott Mac (Doc) 22:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Summersteps Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested Prod, non-notable record label. Ridernyc (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Having two notable acts under contract implies notability.  Plus, it gets a respectable number of views per month (about 30 on average), so there are people referring to it for information.  Kindofdavish (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Another lazy nomination, proposer clearly does not understand that most articles need expansion rather than deletion. Reliable sources exist which proove notability. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 18:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: Having two notable acts doesn't equal notability per WP:CORP. Joe Chill (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.