Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summoning Chess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Summoning Chess
Non notable chess varient invented by the article's author. Delete. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 00:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Whats so bad about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Team.chaotix (talk • contribs)
 * We can't just put an article up about every game or game variation someone invents. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. In other words, subjects should be noteworthy in some way. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 00:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Repeat after me: Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day!. -- Kinu  t /c  00:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable. --cesarb 00:19, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sounds like an interesting game. However, it should be on some webpage somewhere, not in wikipedia.  -- Nortonew 00:38, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above.  ikkyu2  ( talk ) 00:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NFT.  dbtfz talk 00:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sigh delete. WP:NFT. savidan(talk) (e@) 06:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hbackman 06:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor chess variation; article isn't written to WP standards, so perhaps the author should look at the manual of style before developing an article in the sandbox.  (aeropagitica)   06:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. Bad ideas 07:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, non-notable game -- T B C ???   ???   ??? 08:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per noms  James  Kendall   [talk] 12:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable and away from WP standards. Afonso Silva 13:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article itself admits it was made up recently, and "at school one day". Batmanand 15:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Avi 20:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per how many games have "Credits"? -- Jay  (Reply)  21:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn kiddy invention.Blnguyen 02:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. VegaDark 09:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Revert--AlF 16:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.