Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumru Ağıryürüyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Sumru Ağıryürüyen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N. Whole article is based on a single source. Musa Talk  22:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    02:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    02:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    02:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete unless better sourcing can be found as I simply see nothing to suggest obvious keeping and improving. SwisterTwister   talk  05:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have improved article for clarity and referencing and will continue to do that; it looks to have been written originally on the Turkish-language Wikipedia and is not well-sourced there either. Article is useful in showing context of mandolin use in Middle East, which is currently under-reported in Mandolin article.Jacqke (talk) 17:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC) I would like to point out that the original nomination to delete indicated that the article was based on one source. It now has more than 20 sources, and at least one is a news source. Searches for the artist, along with specific songs or albums or groups she played with turn up a lot of links, showing that she does have online notability.Jacqke (talk) 15:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete The many citations added to this article appear to be links to places where the subject is named as having performed on an album. Sources need to discuss the subject of the article in depth, not merely mention the subject's name in passing. Article would need multiple references which discuss the subject in some kind of depth to be retained. KDS 4444 Talk  04:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and particularly KDS4444's assessment.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.