Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SunGlassesUK.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 23:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

SunGlassesUK.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. One 2003 puffpiece? Hipocrite (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 14:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 14:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Note that this is about an online retailer of sunglasses. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. Someone commented on the talk page "Is this an advertisement or what?", and that's my feeling as well. If the fluff were removed, article would be empty, and it seems there is nothing notable to say. Johnuniq (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: relied too much on primary sources. Alexius08 (talk) 07:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is covered in various sources as a successful business idea, it is a notable topic. I would like to understand why the explanatory details of this coverage would be considered "fluff". Cinagua (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Cinagua (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 22:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: just based on the number of statements in the article that are solely sourced to press releases and the subject's own website. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 22:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.