Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Belt Express


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) JAaron95  Talk  10:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Sun Belt Express

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notability. Sources are too weak to establish this; a sraight to video film is almost per se non-notable as a film. TheLongTone (talk) 13:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep:- subject of the article appears to meet WP:NFILM. I found abq journal, Hollywood reporter, this review, Latina, film maker magazine to mention few. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 20:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Filmmaker:
 * Lead:
 * Lead:
 * Studio:
 * Studio:
 * Distributor:

--- may want to withdraw their nomination since the subject notability has been established. Editors often do this at times to avoid unnecessary wasting of time on irrelevant discussion. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 05:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * STRONG Keep and continue cleaning up per it easily meeting WP:NF through the multiple independent reliable sources available. It also won a few awards which need inclusion and citation. And ... had you looked first you might have found the multiple available sources and realized that with its multiple festival screenings since June of 2014, it is not exactly "direct-to-video". It may be "eventually-to-video", but that is not the same thing.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:07, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NRVE, which requires "the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article." That's why we have WP:BEFORE. Cavarrone 21:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.