Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Gro Horticulture Income Fund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep given absence of delete preferences and effective withdrawal of the nomination (non-admin closure). Skomorokh 00:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Sun Gro Horticulture Income Fund

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible advert created by company employee. Creator is at least honest about this possible conflict of interest. Originally tagged for speedy when it consisted of mostly links, but now I'm less sure. Google does provide some evidence to support the 'leading producer' claim BrucePodger (talk) 00:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 01:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 01:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought I once read something, perhaps just an opinion, that any company listed on a major exchange such as the TSX should be considered notable. Any foundation to that? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a poorly-written article, but that's what tags are for. The fact that there's a newspaper source reporting that the company was bought for £120 million is something in itself. PeterSymonds | talk  11:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, third-party coverage and large price-tag would seem to indicate notability. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC).
 * Actually, keep. Its improving and the creator seems to be doing a reasonable job of not just producing an advert. --BrucePodger (talk) 23:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.