Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Ming Sheu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BabbaQ's opinion does not address the verifiability issue.  Sandstein  20:58, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Sun Ming Sheu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Google News searches produce nothing. We are left with the sources given in the article and the blogosphere, which cannot count as reliable--and certainly can't verify the claims and allegations made in the article. Half of the sources in the article are primary sources anyway. If this isn't deleted, it certainly needs to be rewritten in a neutral manner on the basis of reliable sources--which I was unable to find. (Of course, it could be a media conspiracy dictated by the federal government...) Drmies (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - shouldnt be deleted but rewritten in a neutral manner as Drmies points out.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I would love to work with Drmies to address any neutrality issues with the article. None have been raised on the talk page thus far.  Claims made in the article are verifiable in the Black Star News. Greg Comlish (talk) 13:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC) (Note: User:Greg Comlish is the author of the article in question. --MelanieN (talk) 19:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC))
 * Delete It's disgraceful for Wikipedia to have such a non-neutral, unsubstantiated article. The only sources found in a Google News search, and the only ones offered in the article, are from the publication Black Star News, which does not even pretend to be a neutral or fact-based publication, and the opinion blog nakedcapitalism.com, and an anonymous blog at Daily Kos. Not a Reliable Source to be found anywhere. --MelanieN (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per MelanieN. No apparent reliable secondary sources. Deor (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Question What are the claims that people believe are "unsourced"? Greg Comlish (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject fails Notability. Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. SaveATreeEatAVegan 19:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.