Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Records (other companies)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Despite two relists this AfD has been characterised by a lack of interest! The last comment was nearly 3 weeks ago so I can't justify a 3rd relist. This close is without prejudice to a separate move discussion. Just Chilling (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Sun Records (other companies)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Having an article about a bunch of unrelated record labels called "Sun" makes about as much sense as an indiscriminate article about people named "Roger". Either the labels are notable, or they're not. This is just weird. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  09:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.-Nahal  (talk) 11:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment For what it's worth, there have been decades of of discussion about "other" Sun Records labels among record collectors. However, I get the point of the nomination.  With sources I have, I could create articles for the Leeds & Catlin version, the Toronto Canada version, the 1946 Jewish label, and the Albuquerque label.  Often they are discussed, though, in order to dispel confusion for newer collectors who think they have a rare Sam Phillips-related item.  A lot of this article is obvious original research ("listed on ebay"), but I don't think that outright deleting the entire article is the best option per WP:PRESERVE.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move to Sun Records (disambiguation) and cut back significantly, to have only one line about each of the record companies that don't have articles yet. Since there are two Sun Records companies that already have articles and several others that don't (although some might have articles in the future), disambiguation seems appropriate for this situation. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hugsyrup (talk) 12:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.