Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Xinde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  16:21, Dec. 23, 2005

Sun Xinde
Seems to be non-notable. The English version has been written entirely by one person, and has been inactive for several months. I only found about 300 google hits (with either the romanized or chinese name  given). Only one wikipedia page links to it (in the caption of an image) and, although I can't read Chinese at all, it seems that the Chinese language version of the article has been deleted already. A similar page was created at the Wikimedia Commons; I don't know much about that project, but it strikes me as odd that it was made by the same user. TheIncredibleEdibleOompaLoompa 02:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Very thorough nomination. Good job.  I note you didn't add a vote, either, which is great to see. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:20, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy as nn-bio / CSD A7 Jamie 07:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Per Durova, delete rather than speedy.   Jamie 07:51, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The article asserts notability. Unfortunately I am in no position to verify the noteworthiness of the Chinese Archives of Calligraphy.  Non-Western subjects have an inherent disadvantage in this situation.  Let's give this the usual five days in case some qualified person can cite sources. Durova 07:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been added to the list of China-related deletions. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 20:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nomination. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:20, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - FrancisTyers 16:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.