Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday UpMarket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Sunday UpMarket

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The whole article is one sentence (which only asserts notability through "leading"), a link (I added) and one category (I added, but couldn't find any other that applied), It fails WP:N and WP:ORG. G-hits are negligible at best. Leonard(Bloom) 19:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Possible speedy under A3. It's barely a dictionary def. -- neon white talk 23:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete -Speedy if possible -- seems to be an advert, but a rather poor one since it fails to provide any substantive content, merely a link to an external website. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.