Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sundial Collective


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  02:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Sundial Collective

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. The Per WP:AUD, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability. I am generally unable to find coverage of this company outside of local media; the sources in this article include small local newspaper Redding Record Searchlight and local television station KRCR-TV, and I'm not able to find coverage of this business outside of exclusively local stations and a trivial mention in a single trade journals (and, per WP:ORGIND there is a presumption against the use of coverage in trade magazines to establish notability). Because this fails WP:NCORP, and WP:ORGCRIT notes that NCORP establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than we may see in other contexts, this should be deleted for failing to meet the relevant notability criteria in line with WP:DEL-REASON#8. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and California. —  Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 01:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete There could be more coverage as this store is being bought by a local tribal group. Only one maybe two of the sources are good enough to establish GNG.

 Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 03:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the source assessment table. Is there a reason you're applying GNG rather than NCORP here? —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Nope, it's just what the template popped out, let me go back and see if it'll do SNG. Sorry if it caused any confusion, I completely agree with your assessment and nomination. The only reason I mentioned that there could be more coverage was incase someone had access to like a tribal newspaper that isn't online or something.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 04:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That makes sense. With respect to tables, there is ORGCRIT assess table, but it's really heavy to use don't think that there's anything akin to the SA Table Generator script that currently works on it. Now that I'm thinking about it, I might have to try to create a modified version of that to work better with ORGCRIT. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * It's funny you mention that I was cleaning up after dinner and was thinking the same thing. It would be really helpful for AfDs.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 04:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment as nom. I think that the following NCORP Assessment Table might clarify some of the ambiguity with respect to the sources, which include another source I was able to find online:

On top of the above, even if these sources were enough to contribute towards notability, we're still dealing with a substantial WP:AUD problem inasmuch as these are both subregional (i.e. local) publications. I truly can't find any coverage of this entity even in broader regional media, which is the death knell for the article subject's notability in my view. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ORGCRIT per the source analysis above.4meter4 (talk) 02:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.