Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunetra Choudhury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 00:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Sunetra Choudhury

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Media person with easy access to press and doubtful notability. All references seem to be from her publishers, NDTV and Hachette India, and not independent. Fails WP:GNG. PROD reverted with "seems notable to me". §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Her book Braking News, which was published in 2010, was reviewed in (among others) Outlook India, a very popular and pan-India general news magazine, and Hindustan Times, a very popular and pan-India newspaper. That makes her notable per WP:AUTHOR: "3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Thanks, Biwom (talk) 16:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That work is neither "significant" nor "well-known". §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Individual is a published journalist and TV anchor, not just an author.  Easily passes basic WP:GNG across multiple sources.  Article is weak and needs more work, but notability is adequate.   Montanabw (talk)  00:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Citation needed. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The citations for the book coverage were given. She passes GNG, per . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * GNG : "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." (emphasis added). §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:12, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - First the Outlook piece is not a review, but a book listing, the description of which is usually provided by the publisher. The Hindustan piece is indeed a review, albeit brief. The current citations in the article do nothing to show notability (the most promising of which, another Hindustan piece, is a dead link). Searches turned up not nearly enough notable in-depth coverage from independent sources to show they pass notability guidelines, and since none of the keep !votes above deigned to share what they feel make this pass GNG (other than Biwom, who did give a single short source), have no other choice than to vote delete.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 14:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.