Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sungkyun Language Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge into Sungkyunkwan University. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Sungkyun Language Institute

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I see no reasonable assertions that this language school is notable in any way, and the primary contributor appears deep in conflict of interest on the topic. Attempts to have the info merged with Sungkyunkwan University have been rejected, but without any argument why the division is notable on its own. &mdash; Coren (talk) 22:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as "a semi-autonomous division of Sungkyunkwan University" it is not appropriate for more than a mention in the article. In practice, AfD can be used to force a merge when there is clear consensus to do so, as I would expect in this case. DGG (talk) 02:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 19:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Sungkyunkwan University seems a good solution. TerriersFan (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is a notable language institute in South Korea. I would later add relevant sources on the notability. --Caspian blue (talk) 22:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Sungkyunkwan University if Caspian cannot provide reliable references soon.IceUnshattered (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge, Although the institute is famous in South Korea, I could not find "reliable sources" except promotion-like articles from news, media. So I would say "merge".--Caspian blue (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.