Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Sharma (2rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:56, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Sunil Sharma
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the same article was deleted earlier after discussion. Notability not observed. He is just a Owner of a Private University. References not included, who show the notability. Only personal weblink of private university is provided. the page should be deleted immediately Jussychoulex (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 10.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  06:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, arguably A7, since Chancellor is a purely ceremonial position per Chancellor (education), not qualifying for WP:PROF C6 - and there is some question about whether such a recently founded school, with a small student body, qualifies as a major academic institution in any sense. Searching for secondary sources via Gnews proved rather fruitless, but turned up lots of people with the same name, including a scholar at BU who may actually be notable, so fails WP:BIO anyhow. Ray  Talk 12:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- agree with nom and Ray, except for the A7 indication -- chancellor and founder of a university is sufficient to block a speedy deletion, but RS and indication of notability of the school needs to be established to be kept at AfD and there is not sufficient notability I could find to merit a keep. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 03:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.