Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil tulsiani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus indicates that the sources provided do not justify an article, they don't appear to go in depth much. Also concerns about the article being a repost. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Sunil tulsiani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability - another real-estate person. Refs show he exists and the rest are recursive refs back to a Wikipedia mirror and two press releases. Nothing here gets close to notability. Fails WP:GNG. I would be content to see this speedy deleted if others agree it is merited.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment:Has been deleted as Sunil Tulsiani FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 15:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I found three sources that are independent, likely reliable, and offer more than passing mentions of the subject. Interestingly, one of these was improperly cited in the article (showing the subject as author); and, unless there are two people by this name in Ontario, two soures show that the subject may have engaged in some unsavory business practices:</ul> Rebb  ing  16:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Given the borderline notability and the fact that he's basically only known for one negative event, I think we should delete this. --Randykitty (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. We have qualifying nontrivial coverage, but it's not enough to meet the "significant coverage" required by the applicable guidelines. Rebb  ing  19:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam and having previously been deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.