Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunkara Venkata Adinarayana Rao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 00:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Sunkara Venkata Adinarayana Rao

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable doctor. Also there is no much coverage in the media. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * delete article has been WP:PROMO and unsourced since it was created. Subject may be notable but this article would need to be completely written actually using reliable sources, so TNT applies. Jytdog (talk) 03:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Subject meets WP:GNG (sources are cited in article). It should be noted that most of Indian newspapers do not keep archives for their publications before 2000-01. Therefore, online-unavailability of sources for any topic including this one whose mature phase belongs to pre-2000 period should be understandable. Anup   [Talk]  02:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * mm you cleaned it up but he is not N like his brother. Jytdog (talk) 02:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * yup, doesn't meet any special criteria, but may be 'general notability guideline'. In addition to cited sources, I've assumed that there are few more (good ones) but just not available at this time. Anup   [Talk]  12:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as passes WP:GNG also notable award Atlantic306 (talk) 06:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, in the context of non-English individuals, he has sufficient sources covering him. 92.6.187.195 (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.