Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunn-hemp mosaic virus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mz7 (talk) 00:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Sunn-hemp mosaic virus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the references back up info on the page; none of the information is cited; page has been marked as "needs additional citations for verification" since July 2019 without any updates; I can't find any references that verify info on the page Lonehexagon (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 18.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep It seems readily apparent that this is a notable virus which is the subject of significant scholarly study. The nomination's claims seem to be erroneous. Note also that the nominator has made no other edits this year and did not notify the creator of the article. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or Speedy Keep: An IP editor has worked on the referencing, and I don't see any statements not supported by the related reference.  The virus is recognised by the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses.  References include a book chapter (in a volume edited by two wiki-notable editors) on the virus and a paper in Nature.  A Google Scholar search shows over 400 papers referring to this virus, so it seems clearly notable to me. , will you comment on what references you think don't back up the related information, and on the changes made by the IP editor?  EdChem (talk) 11:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - documented viruses are automatically notable. Bearian (talk) 00:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Snow close as keep, per . please consider withdrawing this spurious nomination. Nick Moyes (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.