Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunny Side Up (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. There are obviously more than enough sources now to show notability. (non-admin closure) Tim  meh  ! ( review me ) 00:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Sunny Side Up (album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreleased album, no notability asserted. Created by blocked sock puppet. This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 21:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Album's release is less than a week away, and the artist is inexplicably popular. Plenty of reviews/coverage already easily found:, , , , , , .--Michig (talk) 05:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, at least for now - No rush to delete as it would only be recreated in a week once the album is released. If it is not released next week, it would then be an appropriate discussion to have as to whether the article should be deleted.  Sources seem to be available for the album, so from that perspective too keeping, at least for now, seems appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 17:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes keep, Its released in 6 days anyway!!! --BEP66 (talk) 21:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: did you create the article? This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 12:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment No i did not create this article. --BEP66 (talk) 15:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Though it lacks substantial coverage in its current version, it is an official release from a notable musician, albeit a few days away. It has also received album reviews from reliable sources, as Michig noted above. Clearly passes WP:NALBUMS. —  Σ xplicit  06:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per comments above. ↔NMajdan &bull;talk 23:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. On the "lack of substantial coverage": these have appeared in the last few days, including several newspaper reviews and an STV feature:, , , , , . --Michig (talk) 06:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. This album is out now and the information is accurate. No point in deleting this page. Every album has its own Wikipedia page, so why aren't they flagged for deletion?! 13:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.143.198.191 (talk)
 * Keep Album now released, significant coverage in reliable sources provided establishing notability. Davewild (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.