Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunny Vaghela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Sunny Vaghela

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks any real coverage about him, only a few quotes from him. A search found a little more of the same but nothing fog GNG. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * weak keep - a quick search found some articles in notable Indian papers. I added a little info, but there's certainly also a lot of fawning, awkward non-encyclopedic coverage.  Here's other coverage [][see bottom of article][][]Timtempleton (talk) 23:35, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Timtempleton. The sources: first, minor local interest piece on a uni workshop. second, just a few quotes from him. third, self published book, not a reliable source. four, event listing, promotion for a local workshop. Not impressed. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Info from the most notable coverage I could find from Times of India has been added to the article.Timtempleton (talk) 18:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, he's quoted in the sources, but that's about it. There is zero depth of coverage, and as such the subject does not meet WP:BIO. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as the listed sources above are in fact clear published and republished PR including ones that are heavily shown of paid press, nothing else genuinely convincing here and removing it is the solution. SwisterTwister   talk  01:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails basic notability criteria in addition to that subject require significant coverage in multiple reliable-cum-independent sources to establish notability. In past article(s) with same title was deleted as per different CSD and AfDs that can be found here and here. —  San ska ri  Hangout 17:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.