Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suno TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There are no arguments being made here that this channel has substantial coverage in reliable sources, and that's all that counts under our guidelines.  Sandstein  08:00, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Suno TV

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This new Pakistani TV channel has no references that demonstrate it meets the WP:GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 19:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Although it is a newly launched TV channel, with some primary and unreliable sources, but according to Wikipedia TV stations may be provisionally notable in reference to their respective official license provider (in this case, Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority PEMRA) which I have now added as reference. So I am updating the article from time to time and whenever there are references to some independent and reliable sources I will add them.M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Response on this. A broadcast license is not a golden ticket, but it helps. It's also worth noting that in India/Pakistan, licenses are required to distribute any television service, not just over-the-air transmissions (this is a difference from the North American use). There are non-notable broadcast stations out there. TV channels aren't born with notability from the moment they hit the air; they earn it by coverage in reliable sources. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:BROADCAST. The PEMRA license merely indicates that the news channel exists. There is not a single source that can suggest its notability. The source Mediaspring PK cited twice is a blog site, hence not reliable. The rest are promotional or primary sources. Insight 3 (talk) 10:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Insight 3, The PEMRA license indicates its provisional notability, not for a longer time as Wikipedia said as it is a new channel and you can't find any secondary and reliable sources quickly when the channel is almost 2 month old. And for other sources, I have explained well before. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 13:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep It's relatively new but PEMRA-licensed channel with a significant viewership and following on social media. Also in Pakistan it's very rare for media channels to have coverage on rival media unless there's some controversy. So we can't expect much coverage from those sources anytime soon. The channel otherwise is very much notable and deserve an article. Muneebll (talk) 12:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:13, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Neutral question I'm confused to as whether this is a satellite or over-the-air channel outside the expected IPTV coverage; a new broadcast network would be appropriately sourced and I'm not seeing whether it's OTA or not. Please let us know so we can adjust appropriately. The other item with Haroon al Rasheed being listed as a talk show host is questionable, as he's a cleric likely giving sermons, not commenting on news events.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per @M.Ashraf333. 111.119.178.177 (talk) 15:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I didn't find sufficient evidence of notability. Please ping me if good sources are identified. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:12, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, nothing notable found. Licensing documents are not useful for GNG, beyond proving the station exists. Oaktree b (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep, a newly launched satellite that deserves coverage, being a citizen of the country, I've been witnessing the advertisement and promotion, shows being onaired that deserves coverage and should remain published.Lillyput4455 (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.